A Brief Examination of Alternative Views of Cancer (Part 2)

In spite of the “War on Cancer,” occurrences of the disease have only accelerated and new forms have arisen, with devastating effects in young and old alike. The occurrence of childhood cancers has exploded. In fact, cancer has become the number one cause of death by disease in children.

While many theories have evolved over these decades, there has been a reluctance to disengage from the one cause/one solution approach. When we observe from 30,000 feet, we can see that the historical trend has been to identify one element from which the disease originates and to aggressively treat that offender.

Some say parasites, others suggest fungus. Virologists may claim that viruses are the culprit and geneticists will insist that the problem is our ancestral heritage. Still others point to toxins such as chemicals or metals. Even the mycotoxins excreted by microbes have been identified as problematic. With each conclusion, the drive becomes one which drills down on the one “cause” creating an industry around “solutions” that address that singular issue.

This subject, of course, commands a deep dive.That is beyond our purview, however, as It truly requires a lifetime of diligent research. Instead, we will highlight a few alternative theories and present a sample of alternative modalities. We will do our best to help you connect some dots and encourage you on your path of discovery.

Keep in mind that countless JWLABS users have reported that when they add the Rife machine to their protocol (whether conventional or alternative) the results often exceed expectations. This indicates a synergistic effect in which the frequency applications seem to enhance the effectiveness of other modalities. These reports span nearly four decades, thus we have come to expect them.

Though we don’t adhere to the notion that there is one cause for the explosion of cancer, we found the following discussion compelling. We encourage you to consider that this may be a significant contributor. Please listen to this discussion with an open mind and consider that this information may be particularly useful in your endeavor to understand the possible links to the problem we are facing.

VIDEO:
Questioning the Cause of Cancer: What You’re Not Being Told (w/ Sasha Latypova)

(Click image to play video)

About 49 minutes in —

Though we don’t have the direct data that vaccines cause cancer, the strongest evidence lies in the following:

There are at least three major mechanisms of causing cancer and other major chronic illnesses built into the vaccines. (Click the tabs below for more information.)

Sasha Latypova makes the case that this anaphylactic reaction increases with continued exposure, increasing inflammatory response which results in allergies, leaky gut, autoimmune disorders, and potential cancers. This reaction seems to be considered an issue only in the case of dramatic events, but esteemed researcher Charles Richet makes the case that even mild responses to injections of proteins establish a base from which the body reacts increasingly more dramatically with continued administration of said products.

“We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction, the organism suffers and becomes resistant. This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of revolt against the second parenteral injection which would be fatal. At the first injection, the organism was taken by surprise and did not resist. At the second injection, the organism mans its defences and answers by the anaphylactic shock.

Seen in these terms, anaphylaxis is a universal defense mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances in the blood, whence they can not be eliminated.”

Given the concern that Richet raises about introducing what he calls “alien proteins“ into the body, we might be compelled to ask:

Here, the discussion emphasizes the fact that the greatest harm in ingesting metals is when they are injected. Aluminum and other metals are more easily tolerated when consumed through the gastrointestinal system, but when injected into the bloodstream, they are known to have an immediate effect on the blood (causing rouleau, a precursor to clotting), and can go anywhere throughout the neurological system to wreak havoc. These metal substances diminish the voltage of the cells, depleting them of energy.

This is especially a problem in the newer vaccines, particularly because of the liquid nanoparticle. The lipid nanoparticle itself is the number one driver of what we now call turbo cancers because they effectively penetrate the membranes and whatever is attached to them will be dragged into the membrane.

The cells have a natural ability to move these toxins out, and when overwhelmed, they attempt to insulate themselves from the invading element. In doing so, they are dividing themselves into compartments, if you will, sequestering the toxin. Thus, what we see is that the liquid nanoparticles are encouraging, even accelerating cell division. Which is a hallmark of these rapidly growing cancers.

In summary, the injection of toxins such as metals and animal protein wreak havoc on the system, increasing inflammatory response, stimulating the clotting mechanism, and in some cases encouraging unheeded cell division. Needless to say, with repeated dosing, the effects are cumulative. The body struggles to eliminate the poisons, even as it works to repair the damage.

To learn more about the history of the vaccine industry, we suggest the following book. We think you will find it enlightening.

Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth

If you like this content, please comment below and let us know what requests you have for further discussion.

A Brief Examination of Alternative Views of Cancer (Part 3)

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply